Re: prokind column (was Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: prokind column (was Re: [HACKERS] SQL procedures)
Date: 2018-02-28 01:39:31
Message-ID: 20180228013931.GD1476@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 11:50:31AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> We support the various psql/describe.c features against old servers,
> so it would be quite inconsistent for tab completion not to work
> similarly. There are some gaps in that already, as per the other
> thread, but we should clean those up not add more.

I'll try to study this thread a bit more as I lack context. So I'll
reply there. What I am scared of is that Tomas Munro has done a heroic
effort to increase the readability of psql's tab completion during the
dev cycle of 9.6. And it would be sad to reduce the quality of this
code.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-02-28 01:45:24 Re: MSVC builld of 9.5.12 is broken?
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2018-02-28 01:37:07 Re: compress method for spgist - 2