Re: Add PGDLLIMPORT to enable_hashagg

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Brian Cloutier <brian(at)citusdata(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Metin Doslu <metin(at)citusdata(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, legrand legrand <legrand_legrand(at)hotmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add PGDLLIMPORT to enable_hashagg
Date: 2018-02-21 18:14:06
Message-ID: 20180221181406.p4e62spvev3kxanb@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2018-02-16 12:57:40 -0800, Brian Cloutier wrote:
> Thanks for committing this! We forgot to ask though, could you please
> backport this patch to 10 and maybe even 9.6? As-is I don't think these
> variables will be available until PG 11.

I think these days our policy is to do that on request, which e.g. was
done on c572599c. Could you take the relevant commit, backport it to the
relevant branches, resolve conflicts, make possibly appropriate
adaptions, and post?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2018-02-21 18:55:20 Re: pgsql: Avoid valgrind complaint about write() of uninitalized bytes.
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-02-21 18:06:58 Weird failures on lorikeet