Re: pg_upgrade and materialized views

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Victor Yegorov <vyegorov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and materialized views
Date: 2018-02-21 17:33:44
Message-ID: 20180221173344.wjp4r6lxhcm35pzv@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 2018-02-21 10:08:12 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Victor Yegorov <vyegorov(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Is it possible, that bug #14852 is of the same nature as the issue at hand
> > here?
> > https://postg.es/m/20171013115320.28049.86457@wrigleys.postgresql.org
>
> For the archives' sake, the correct link is
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20171013115320.28049.86457@wrigleys.postgresql.org

Yea, it does.

> Yeah, that does look suspiciously like a set of facts matching this
> problem :-(

I'd personally say ;), given that it's one less potentially data
corrupting bug to worry about ;). And it's one that can be fixed without
dataloss to boot.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-02-21 23:45:26 Re: pg_upgrade and materialized views
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-02-21 15:08:12 Re: pg_upgrade and materialized views