Re: docu bug?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: "Zwettler Markus (OIZ)" <Markus(dot)Zwettler(at)zuerich(dot)ch>
Cc: "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: docu bug?
Date: 2018-02-20 09:55:32
Message-ID: 20180220095532.GA1322@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 08:00:35AM +0000, Zwettler Markus (OIZ) wrote:
> Yes. I think the exclusive backup method should be mentioned
> especially as it is the older one.

Attached is a suggestion of patch. What do you think?
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
backup-doc-exclusive.patch text/x-diff 541 bytes

In response to

  • AW: docu bug? at 2018-02-20 08:00:35 from Zwettler Markus (OIZ)

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2018-02-20 16:23:46 mistake. "whereas cidr does not."
Previous Message Zwettler Markus (OIZ) 2018-02-20 08:00:35 AW: docu bug?