Re: query's performance

From: PT <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
To: hmidi slim <hmidi(dot)slim2(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: query's performance
Date: 2018-02-15 21:55:17
Message-ID: 20180215165517.2fc49bf2c8e19ba03a2284cd@potentialtech.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 22:43:59 +0100
hmidi slim <hmidi(dot)slim2(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi,
> I have a table establishment which contains these columns: id, name,
> longitude, latitude.
> I want to select all the establishments in the table establishment within a
> radius from a reference point which is a given establishment.
> For example:
> I have a given establishment called establishment1 and has an id=1.
> I want to display all the establishments within a radius 1km from this
> establishment.
> I wrote this query:
> select e.name,e1.name, e1.longitude, e1.latitude
> from establishment as e, establishment as e1
> where e.id = 1
> and e.id <> e1.id
> and ST_DWithin(ST_SetSRID(ST_MakePoint(e1.longitude, e1.latitude),
> 4326),ST_MakePoint(e.longitude, e.latitude)::geography, 1000) ;
>
> Is it a good practice to iterate the rows of the table like I did and does
> not have an effect in the performance if the number of table's rows
> increase?

If performance is a concern, don't use long/lat in 2 columns. Instead use a
GEOGRAPHY type to store the point. You can then index on that GEOGRAPHY
column and queries against it will be quite fast.

The way you have it now is going to degrate in performance linearally with
the number of rows in the table. With the proper types and indexes, performance
degredation will be considerably less.

--
Bill Moran

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Azimuddin Mohammed 2018-02-16 00:21:22 postgres not starting
Previous Message PT 2018-02-15 21:47:57 Re: Can parallel vacuum commands lead to a lock in Postgres 10.2