From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: tapeblocks is uninitialized in logtape.c |
Date: | 2018-02-14 21:07:55 |
Message-ID: | 20180214210755.dgjsbah3544y5eld@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Actually, on looking closer, it's more likely got something to do with
> whether or not you used --enable-cassert. If the Assert at the top of
> the function is disabled, then IMO a compiler that failed to complain
> about this coding would be pretty damn broken.
I tried removing the Assert, and my compiler doesn't complain. I
noticed that the function is static and the only caller has its own
assert about ntapes; yet removing that one doesn't cause a warning
either. I made the function non-static -- still no warning.
gcc (Debian 6.3.0-18) 6.3.0 20170516
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-02-14 21:13:29 | Re: tapeblocks is uninitialized in logtape.c |
Previous Message | Nikolay Shaplov | 2018-02-14 21:06:36 | Re: [PATCH][PROPOSAL] Add enum releation option type |