| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Why does load_external_function() return PGFunction? |
| Date: | 2018-02-07 06:54:58 |
| Message-ID: | 20180207065458.sowsqipstl7kinhf@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-02-06 15:43:29 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > We've several callers to load_external_function() that do not use the
> > returned value as a PGFunction. I'd vote for changing the return type to
> > void * and have fmgr.c cast it to PGFunction after verifying the
> > function's magic.
>
> void* isn't necessarily compatible with function pointers --- there are
> platforms where they're physically different widths, though possibly
> you'd never get PG to run on such hardware anyway.
Fair point. Although we're relying on dlsym like infrastructure, which
returns just a void *.
> However, given that a cast is going to be necessary anyway, it seems
> like this is mostly useless churn...
Ok, can live with that too. Just though it was a bit weird...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Khandekar | 2018-02-07 07:11:25 | Re: Query running for very long time (server hanged) with parallel append |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2018-02-07 06:34:44 | Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables |