Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] taking stdbool.h into use
Date: 2018-02-02 04:16:22
Message-ID: 20180202041622.GB3267@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 09:04:57AM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I've been testing this a bit further and during a test setup with 4-byte
> bools I still got regression test failures related to GIN, so it doesn't
> seem quite ready. I'll keep working on it.

Cool. Thanks for the update.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-02-02 04:22:24 Re: [PoC PATCH] Parallel dump to /dev/null
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-02-02 04:13:49 Re: [HACKERS] Refactoring identifier checks to consistently use strcmp