| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "gregory(at)arenius(dot)com" <gregory(at)arenius(dot)com>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SPI not defined. |
| Date: | 2018-01-30 03:26:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20180130032616.GA23631@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 03:07:06PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Monday, January 29, 2018, PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> No, SPI in that module is indeed "Server Programming Interface".
>
> I would recommend that the module page define
>
> the spi acronym.
>
> Seems reasonable.
How is the attached patch?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| spi.diff | text/x-diff | 1.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2018-01-30 03:39:22 | Re: SPI not defined. |
| Previous Message | Jim Ryan | 2018-01-30 02:31:46 | Re: pg_upgrade docs are confusing if PostgreSQL's versioning system/language isn't known to reader |