From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, sanyam jain <sanyamjain22(at)live(dot)in>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Setting BLCKSZ 4kB |
Date: | 2018-01-26 23:06:21 |
Message-ID: | 20180126230621.fzwz2rwjal4mqg43@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-01-26 23:53:33 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> But more importantly, I don't see why the size of the internal page
> would matter here at all? SSDs have non-volatile write cache (DRAM with
> battery), protecting all the internal writes to pages. If your SSD does
> not do that correctly, it's already broken no matter what page size it
> uses even with full_page_writes=on.
Far far from all SSDs have non-volatile write caches. And if they
respect barrier requests (i.e. flush before returning), they're not
broken.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2018-01-26 23:16:11 | Re: [HACKERS] Refactoring identifier checks to consistently use strcmp |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2018-01-26 23:00:48 | Re: PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts |