From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem |
Date: | 2018-01-25 14:41:38 |
Message-ID: | 20180125144138.otxjbrotnof3n6q5@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 4:11 AM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > *** 128,134 ****
> > SELECT pg_relation_size('vactst', 'main');
> > pg_relation_size
> > ------------------
> > ! 0
> > (1 row)
> >
> > SELECT count(*) FROM vactst;
> > --- 128,134 ----
> > SELECT pg_relation_size('vactst', 'main');
> > pg_relation_size
> > ------------------
> > ! 8192
> > (1 row)
> However, shouldn't an empty relation have an initial page anyway? In
> that case shouldn't the correct value be 8192?
No, it's legal for an empty table to have size 0 on disk.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-01-25 15:01:19 | Re: reducing isolation tests runtime |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-01-25 14:40:10 | Re: [PATCH][PROPOSAL] Refuse setting toast.* reloptions when TOAST table does not exist |