From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Frank van Vugt <ftm(dot)van(dot)vugt(at)foxi(dot)nl>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: minor annoyance - search_path not reset in/after dump/restore |
Date: | 2018-01-24 14:47:11 |
Message-ID: | 20180124144711.GH17109@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 08:45:24PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 23, 2018, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> The attached patch adds a RESET ALL to the end of the text dump to cause
> a reset of all GUC variables. Does this make sense to folks? It would
> only be applied to head, so it would only appear in PG 11.
>
>
> I'm inclined to take the position that if you are going to do something like
> this you should decide how to proceed when the restore completes. Adding \c or
> RESET ALL immediately after that \i is straight-forward enough and at least in
> the \c case you'd get the effects of any ALTER DATABASE SET commands in the
> dump. Now, usually I would place the \i itself in a file and not type it
> interactively...
>
> While I cannot imagine anyone depending on the current behavior it does
> encourage one to reconnect to the loaded database regardless of how the restore
> happened.
OK, agreed. A pg_dumpall restore will leave you in a different
database. I will assume this item is closed.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-01-24 18:35:02 | Re: Fwd: Error about save extracted data |
Previous Message | Patrik Uytterhoeven | 2018-01-24 13:19:04 | postgis package broken in postgresql 9.3 repo |