From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Subscription code improvements |
Date: | 2018-01-22 22:58:18 |
Message-ID: | 20180122225818.GY2416@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greetings,
* Michael Paquier (michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Peter Eisentraut
> >> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >>> On 8/8/17 05:58, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> >>>> Are you planning to work on remaining patches 0005 and 0006 that
> >>>> improve the subscription codes in PG11 cycle? If not, I will take over
> >>>> them and work on the next CF.
> >>>
> >>> Based on your assessment, the remaining patches were not required bug
> >>> fixes. So I think preparing them for the next commit fest would be great.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Thank you for the comment.
> >>
> >> After more thought, since 0001 and 0003 patches on the first mail also
> >> improve the subscription codes and are worth to be considered, I
> >> picked total 4 patches up and updated them. I'm planning to work on
> >> these patches in the next CF.
> >>
> >
> > Added this item to the next commit fest.
>
> The patch set fails to apply. Please provide a rebased version. I am
> moving this entry to next CF with waiting on author as status.
Masahiko Sawada, this patch is still in Waiting on Author and hasn't
progressed in a very long time. Is there any chance you'll be able to
provide an updated patch soon for review? Or should this patch be
closed out?
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2018-01-22 23:21:00 | Re: [HACKERS] make async slave to wait for lsn to be replayed |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-01-22 22:55:59 | Re: unique indexes on partitioned tables |