| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data |
| Date: | 2018-01-12 21:40:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20180112214045.z3ovjyxiqtogtnv4@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-01-12 18:36:14 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> As above -- do we really like our current format so much that we're
> satisfied with minor tweaks?
A definite no from here. I think especially pg_proc desperately needs
something key=value like to be understandable, and that very clearly
seems to be something we can't do in the current format.
- Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-01-12 21:58:58 | Re: Changing WAL Header to reduce contention during ReserveXLogInsertLocation() |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-01-12 21:36:14 | Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data |