Re: Is this still accurate?

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: "Moser, Glen G" <Glen(dot)Moser(at)charter(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is this still accurate?
Date: 2018-01-05 18:00:19
Message-ID: 20180105180019.GP2416@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Greetings,

* Moser, Glen G (Glen(dot)Moser(at)charter(dot)com) wrote:
> That's really the gist of the concern from a team member of mine. Not that the 4TB number is wrong but that it could be misleading to assume that 4TB is some sort of upper bound.
>
> That's how this concern was relayed to me and I am just following up.

Well, saying 'in excess of' is pretty clear, but I don't think the
sentence is really adding much either, so perhaps we should just remove
it.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-01-05 18:18:03 Re: J.2. Tool Sets/Appendix J. Documentation missing package
Previous Message Moser, Glen G 2018-01-05 17:57:37 RE: Is this still accurate?