From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Enhance pg_stat_wal_receiver view to display connected host |
Date: | 2018-01-04 11:54:37 |
Message-ID: | 20180104115437.guce5pt3vd3id65c@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I think more attention should be given to the libpq side of this patch;
maybe have a 0001 with only the new libpq function, to easily verify
that it does all it needs to do. It needs docs for the new function in
libpq.sgml; also I wonder if checking conn->status before reporting
values is necessary; finally, has the application any good way to check
that the values can be safely read after calling the new function?
Nit: the new libpq function name is not great with all those lowercase
letters. Better to make it camelCase like the rest of the libpq API?
Thanks for the patch,
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2018-01-04 11:55:45 | Re: Faster inserts with mostly-monotonically increasing values |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2018-01-04 11:24:20 | Re: [PATCH] Logical decoding of TRUNCATE |