| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: copy_file_range is now a Linux kernel call |
| Date: | 2018-01-03 08:46:44 |
| Message-ID: | 20180103084644.766glmry6xpjpzez@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-01-02 23:34:47 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2018-01-02 23:08:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Bleah --- "rwnd" is unpronounceable and not an abbreviation we're
> >> currently using anywhere. If we go that way, let's brave carpal tunnel
> >> syndrome by calling it "rewind_copy_file_range". But I'm not that
> >> happy with any of these.
>
> > rewind_copy_file_range works for me.
>
> >> Maybe go with copy_file_chunk like e2fsprogs did?
>
> > -0.2 - don't think it hurts to signal this isn't a general function.
>
> Fair enough. You want to do the honors, or shall I?
Will do tomorrow morning, unless you beat me to it over there on the
cold coast.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2018-01-03 08:52:14 | Do we really need to switch to per-tuple memory context in ATRewriteTable() when Table Rewrite is not happening |
| Previous Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2018-01-03 07:48:07 | Re: Enhance pg_stat_wal_receiver view to display connected host |