From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: copy_file_range is now a Linux kernel call |
Date: | 2018-01-03 04:14:26 |
Message-ID: | 20180103041426.yfw5c7a5ydxsllbs@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2018-01-02 23:08:05 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2018-01-02 22:44:04 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > something like rwnd_copy_file_range or such.
> Bleah --- "rwnd" is unpronounceable and not an abbreviation we're
> currently using anywhere. If we go that way, let's brave carpal tunnel
> syndrome by calling it "rewind_copy_file_range". But I'm not that
> happy with any of these.
rewind_copy_file_range works for me.
> Filipe Rosset pointed out to me off-list that we're not the only
> ones feeling the pain:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/e2fsprogs/code/ci/01551bdba16ab16512a01affe02ade32c41ede8a
>
> Maybe go with copy_file_chunk like e2fsprogs did?
-0.2 - don't think it hurts to signal this isn't a general function.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-01-03 04:31:12 | Re: Copyright update |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2018-01-03 04:11:22 | Re: Observations in Parallel Append |