Re: Edit query buffer

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Wood, Bruce" <Bruce(dot)Wood(at)ngc(dot)com>, Postgres Win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Edit query buffer
Date: 2004-11-04 03:18:33
Message-ID: 20179.1099538313@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> He later stated that he was also testing beta2. I am seeing the same
> failure on our newest pginstaller, beta4.

It's not the "same" failure, but it's pretty obvious that the #ifdef
WIN32 code in do_edit() was never actually tested ... and why shouldn't
the stat() logic work on Windows, anyway?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2004-11-04 03:32:36 Re: pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ...
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-11-04 03:13:15 Re: Edit query buffer

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2004-11-04 13:54:38 Re: possible problem with version string in win32 port
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-11-04 03:13:15 Re: Edit query buffer

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2004-11-04 05:43:12 fix typos in pt_br FAQ
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-11-04 03:13:15 Re: Edit query buffer