From: | Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Lockable views |
Date: | 2017-12-26 09:37:06 |
Message-ID: | 20171226183706.ab250dbb.nagata@sraoss.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 09:44:30 +0900
Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 04:19:46PM +0900, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> > I was busy for and I could not work on this patch. After reading the
> > previous discussion, I still think the behavior of this patch would
> > be right. So, I would like to reregister to CF 2018-1. Do I need to
> > create a new entry on CF? or should I change the status to
> > "Moved to next CF"?
>
> This is entirely up to you. It may make sense as well to spawn a new thread
> and mark the new patch set as v2, based on the feedback received for v1, as
> well as it could make sense to continue with this thread. If the move involves
> a complete patch rewrite with a rather different concept, a new thread is more
> adapted in my opinion.
Thank you for your comment.
I have created a new entry in CF-2017-1 and registered this thread again.
> --
> Michael
--
Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2017-12-26 10:13:22 | Re: BUGFIX: standby disconnect can corrupt serialized reorder buffers |
Previous Message | Tels | 2017-12-26 09:19:42 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication |