From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Feike Steenbergen <feikesteenbergen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Fix permissions check on pg_stat_get_wal_senders |
Date: | 2017-12-23 10:56:26 |
Message-ID: | 20171223105626.GA13920@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 07:49:34AM +0100, Feike Steenbergen wrote:
> On 21 December 2017 at 14:11, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > You mean a WAL receiver here, not a WAL sender.
>
> Fixed, thanks
[nit]
/*
- * Only superusers can see details. Other users only get the pid value
+ * Only superusers and members of pg_read_all_stats can see details.
+ * Other users only get the pid value
* to know whether it is a WAL receiver, but no details.
*/
Incorrect comment format.
[/nit]
Committers run pgindent on each patch before committing anyway, and what
you are proposing here looks good to me, so I am marking that as ready for
committer. Simon, as the original committer of 25fff407, could you look
at what is proposed here?
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-12-23 10:58:00 | Re: Add hint about replication slots when nearing wraparound |
Previous Message | legrand legrand | 2017-12-23 09:58:41 | Re: PoC: custom signal handler for extensions |