From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Get rid of copy_partition_key |
Date: | 2017-12-22 16:24:19 |
Message-ID: | 20171222162419.7hocebnsb4fc4yrj@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
I believe this patch (which also fixes a comment I neglected to fix in
the previous one) should satisfy your concerns.
It's still running a few relevant tests (create_function_1 create_type
point polygon circle create_table copy create_misc create_index
alter_table partition_join partition_prune hash_part) under
CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY + CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS, but so far it's looking
good.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Protect-against-hypothetical-memory-leaks-in-Relatio.patch | text/plain | 4.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-12-22 16:47:56 | Re: pgsql: Get rid of copy_partition_key |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-12-22 16:00:54 | Re: pgsql: Use new overflow aware integer operations. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-12-22 16:47:56 | Re: pgsql: Get rid of copy_partition_key |
Previous Message | Antonin Houska | 2017-12-22 15:43:57 | Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Aggregation push-down |