Re: PostgreSQL suitable?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it>
Cc: Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Date: 2017-12-19 14:55:47
Message-ID: 20171219145547.ij6bexbvqcabpzfb@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Vincenzo Romano wrote:
> I've not tested PG10. But it's not released for production yet!

It definitely is, for a couple of months now. 10.1 (the first bugfix
release) has been out for over a month.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Clarke 2017-12-19 14:56:19 Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Previous Message Vincenzo Romano 2017-12-19 14:50:46 Re: PostgreSQL suitable?