From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Christoph Berg <christoph(dot)berg(at)credativ(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Reproducible builds: genbki.pl vs schemapg.h |
Date: | 2017-12-15 23:21:41 |
Message-ID: | 20171215232141.gx7mkxriaduocxm2@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-12-16 07:52:41 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Christoph Berg
> <christoph(dot)berg(at)credativ(dot)de> wrote:
> > Re: Tom Lane 2017-12-15 <9616(dot)1513351766(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> >> Christoph Berg <christoph(dot)berg(at)credativ(dot)de> writes:
> >> > Debian's reproducible builds project has revealed that the full build
> >> > path gets embedded into server/catalog/schemapg.h:
> >>
> >> genbki.pl is hardly our only script that prints its $0 ...
> >
> > As per
> > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/postgresql-10.html,
> > that's the only place that makes it into the resulting binary.
> > I wouldn't be sending a patch if it didn't fix the issue.
>
> Why not fixing that? Reproducible builds are a trend of these days,
> and what's proposed here is really simple to make PG more compliant
> with this purpose in mind.
It's not like $0 instead of a hardcoded name in the header actually buys
us anything afaict.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-12-15 23:36:00 | Re: Reproducible builds: genbki.pl vs schemapg.h |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-12-15 22:52:41 | Re: Reproducible builds: genbki.pl vs schemapg.h |