Re: To all who wish to unsubscribe

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)lists(dot)simkin(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: To all who wish to unsubscribe
Date: 2017-11-21 18:59:30
Message-ID: 20171121185930.GU4628@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-www

All,

* Alan Hodgson (ahodgson(at)lists(dot)simkin(dot)ca) wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 10:52 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> >     it seems to *ME* like a simpler solution to the original problem
> >       would have been to simply STRIP any DKIM out of the original
> >       messages, and continue to munge headers and footers like mail
> > list
> >       reflectors have been doing for decades.
>
> That wouldn't help; DMARC policies are based on the From: header. If
> you want to munge messages from DMARC-reject senders you need to
> replace the From: header with your own.
>
> Email doesn't work the same as it did decades ago. Senders need to keep
> up.

Please, let's take this debate elsewhere, it's not appropriate here. If
you'd really like to discuss further, you're welcome to email me
directly.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2017-11-21 19:05:37 Re: migrations (was Re: To all who wish to unsubscribe)
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2017-11-21 18:59:16 Re: migrations (was Re: To all who wish to unsubscribe)

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2017-11-21 19:05:37 Re: migrations (was Re: To all who wish to unsubscribe)
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2017-11-21 18:59:16 Re: migrations (was Re: To all who wish to unsubscribe)