Re: [PATCH] Porting small OpenBSD changes.

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: David CARLIER <devnexen(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Porting small OpenBSD changes.
Date: 2017-11-20 19:16:40
Message-ID: 20171120191639.GN4411@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 06:57:47PM +0000, David CARLIER wrote:
> On 20 November 2017 at 18:49, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > David CARLIER <devnexen(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > > - Reducing OpenBSD postfgresql maintainer internal changes bookeeping if
> > > those small changes make sense for the PostgreSQL developers.
> >
> > Hm. The s_lock.c change is surely fine if OpenBSD maintainers say it is.
> >
> > Not sure about adding Motorola 88K support to s_lock.h ... is anybody
> > really still interested in that platform?
>
>
> Yes there is :-)

Any chance of a buildfarm http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/ member or two
with this architecture?

Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-11-20 19:18:45 Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updated tuple
Previous Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2017-11-20 19:09:54 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] A hook for session start