From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Pocock <daniel(at)pocock(dot)pro> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Migration to PGLister - After |
Date: | 2017-11-20 17:54:49 |
Message-ID: | 20171120175449.GL4628@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Greetings,
* Daniel Pocock (daniel(at)pocock(dot)pro) wrote:
> On 20/11/17 18:32, John R Pierce wrote:
> > On 11/20/2017 6:45 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >> The changes which we expect to be most significant to users can be found
> >> on the wiki here:https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PGLister_Announce the
> >> current version of which is also included below.
> >
> > A peeve on this new configuration: if someone does a reply-all and
> > sends both direct and list responses, the direct response ends up in my
> > regular inbox because it doesn't have the List-ID... Previously, the
> > direct reply would still have the Subject: [listname] that I filtered
> > on, so it too would end up in my 'postgres' folder, where I want it.
> >
> > I realize why this was done, and yada yada, what a mess.
>
> People shouldn't do "Reply All" unless they really want you to see the
> reply.
The general policy on this list is to do 'reply all', as there's often
people sending email to the lists who are not also subscribed (but also
because there are people, such as myself, who would prefer to get both
emails).
> Comparing old and new:
>
> List-ID: <pgsql-general.postgresql.org>
>
> has become:
>
> List-Id: <pgsql-general.lists.postgresql.org>
Yes, that's correct.
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zacher, Stacy | 2017-11-20 17:55:37 | unsubscribe |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-11-20 17:53:23 | Re: Migration to PGLister - After |