Re: Interest in a SECURITY DEFINER function current_user stack access mechanism?

From: Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Interest in a SECURITY DEFINER function current_user stack access mechanism?
Date: 2017-10-18 20:26:50
Message-ID: 20171018202649.GC4496@localhost
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:15:01PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> there is a function session_user() already

But it doesn't do this. Are you saying that I should add a
session_user(int)?

Nico
--

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-10-18 20:30:15 Re: [POC] Faster processing at Gather node
Previous Message Nico Williams 2017-10-18 20:15:35 Re: Interest in a SECURITY DEFINER function current_user stack access mechanism?