From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: alter table doc fix |
Date: | 2017-10-18 11:37:22 |
Message-ID: | 20171018113722.2hiflupjhgq5do5d@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Langote wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Noticed that a alter table sub-command's name in Description (where it's
> OWNER) differs from that in synopsis (where it's OWNER TO). Attached
> patch to make them match, if the difference is unintentional.
I agree -- pushed.
This paragraph
<para>
The actions for identity columns (<literal>ADD
GENERATED</literal>, <literal>SET</literal> etc., <literal>DROP
IDENTITY</literal>), as well as the actions
<literal>TRIGGER</literal>, <literal>CLUSTER</literal>, <literal>OWNER</literal>,
and <literal>TABLESPACE</literal> never recurse to descendant tables;
that is, they always act as though <literal>ONLY</literal> were specified.
Adding a constraint recurses only for <literal>CHECK</literal> constraints
that are not marked <literal>NO INHERIT</literal>.
</para>
is a bit annoying, though I think it'd be worse if we "fix" it to be
completely strict about the subcommands it refers to.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2017-10-18 13:20:06 | Re: 64-bit queryId? |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-10-18 11:25:16 | Re: v10 telease note for pg_basebackup refers to old --xlog-method argument |