From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement table partitioning. |
Date: | 2017-10-17 16:52:11 |
Message-ID: | 20171017165211.y6r4umb32jgwjxcv@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
> > Implement table partitioning.
>
> Is it intentional that you can use ALTER TABLE OWNER TO on the parent
> table, and that this does not recurse to modify the partitions' owners?
> This doesn't seem to be mentioned in comments nor documentation, so it
> seems an oversight to me.
The alter table docs say that ONLY must be specified if one does not
want to modify descendants, so I think this is a bug.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-10-17 19:23:19 | Re: pgsql: Fix traversal of half-frozen update chains |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-10-17 16:32:03 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement table partitioning. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeevan Chalke | 2017-10-17 17:14:22 | Re: Partition-wise aggregation/grouping |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-10-17 16:49:55 | Re: SIGSEGV in BRIN autosummarize |