Re: Re: CREATE COLLATION does not sanitize ICU's BCP 47 language tags. Should it?

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: CREATE COLLATION does not sanitize ICU's BCP 47 language tags. Should it?
Date: 2017-10-01 19:00:07
Message-ID: 20171001190007.GA365701@rfd.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 09:56:11AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 9/30/17 03:01, Noah Misch wrote:
> > This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. On the worst
> > week to be violating open item policies. Kindly send a status update within
> > 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status update. Refer to the
> > policy on open item ownership:
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
>
> I had previously replied that I think nothing should be changed. What
> process should be applied in that case?

If you determine community decision-making is not against that conclusion,
edit the list to move the item from "Open Issues" to "Non-bugs".

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2017-10-01 19:48:46 Re: 64-bit queryId?
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-10-01 18:26:27 Re: CREATE COLLATION does not sanitize ICU's BCP 47 language tags. Should it?