Re: alter server for foreign table

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: alter server for foreign table
Date: 2017-09-29 20:19:03
Message-ID: 20170929201902.GX30798@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 01:47:59PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
> > According to Postgresql documentation it is not possible to alter server
> > for foreign table:
> > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/sql-alterforeigntable.html
>
> Hmm, we'd have to check if the table's options were legal for the
> new FDW, but in principle we could support this, I suppose.
> Not sure if it's useful enough to be worth the trouble.

It would definitely be useful if it were available. Nodes are a good
bit more fungible than they were even 5 years back.

Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-09-29 20:26:42 pgsql: Fix inadequate locking during get_rel_oids().
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2017-09-29 20:17:22 Re: Arrays of domains