Re: Logical Replication - test_decoding - unchanged-toast-datum

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Abhinav Singh <abhinav(dot)thegame(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logical Replication - test_decoding - unchanged-toast-datum
Date: 2017-09-28 02:08:08
Message-ID: 20170928020808.wyvyb5f4qr6bji5l@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 2017-09-28 08:19:08 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> This is one of the MANY reasons test_decoding isn't suitable as the base
> for a replication solution. It has "test" in its name for a reason.

FWIW, I don't see why the unchanged toast stuff is that. It's clearly
discernible from actual datums, so ...

I agree that test_decoding isn't a great base of a replication tool, but
I don't think it's completely unsuitable, and I also think that ship has
sailed.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Britto 2017-09-28 07:32:34 Re: WAL Archive command.
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2017-09-28 00:19:08 Re: Logical Replication - test_decoding - unchanged-toast-datum