From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: More efficient truncation of pg_stat_activity query strings |
Date: | 2017-09-19 18:49:18 |
Message-ID: | 20170919184918.lmvh7xhkvxkpvshz@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2017-09-15 17:43:35 +0530, Kuntal Ghosh wrote:
> The patch looks good to me. I've done some regression testing with a
> custom script on my local system. The script contains the following
> statement:
> SELECT 'aaa..<repeated 600 times>' as col;
>
> Test 1
> -----------------------------------
> duration: 300 seconds
> clients/threads: 1
> With the patch TPS:13628 (+3.39%)
> + 0.36% 0.21% postgres postgres [.] pgstat_report_activity
>
> Test 2
> -----------------------------------
> duration: 300 seconds
> clients/threads: 8
> With the patch TPS: 63949 (+20.4%)
> + 0.40% 0.25% postgres postgres [.] pgstat_report_activity
>
> This shows the significance of this patch in terms of performance
> improvement of pgstat_report_activity. Is there any other tests I
> should do for the same?
Thanks for the test! I think this looks good, no further tests
necessary.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2017-09-19 18:49:56 | Re: PoC plpgsql - possibility to force custom or generic plan |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2017-09-19 18:47:26 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add citext_pattern_ops for citext contrib module |