Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test

Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Or we could make upgradecheck a noop, then remove it once all the MSVC
> > animals have upgraded to a newer version of the buildfarm client which
> > does not use upgradecheck anymore (I am fine to send a patch or a pull
> > request to Andrew for that).
>
> This patch is logged as "waiting on author" in the current commit
> fest, but any new patch will depend on the feedback that any other
> hacker has to offer based on the set of ideas I have posted upthread.
> Hence I am yet unsure what is the correct way to move things forward.
> So, any opinions? Peter or others?

I think the first step is to send the rebased version of the patch. It
was last posted in April ...

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services