Re: Re: Poor cost estimate with interaction between table correlation and partial indexes

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Michael Malis <michaelmalis2(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Poor cost estimate with interaction between table correlation and partial indexes
Date: 2017-08-27 15:29:44
Message-ID: 20170827152944.GC16801@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 05:50:26PM -0700, Michael Malis wrote:
> Do you think this is a reasonable approach? Should I start working
> on a patch based on the solution I described or is there some other
> approach I should look into?

You'll get more traction with a proof-of-concept patch accompanying
the plan than without. Don't bother with any level of care past
proof-of-concept until you get positive feedback.

Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2017-08-27 15:49:05 Re: WIP Patch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2017-08-27 09:32:23 Re: More replication race conditions