Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Augustine, Jobin" <jobin(dot)augustine(at)openscg(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken
Date: 2017-08-11 01:55:12
Message-ID: 20170811015512.7x5kl2qcshricgzl@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On 2017-08-10 18:51:07 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 07:25:37PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 8/7/17 21:06, Noah Misch wrote:
> > >> That would fit. Until v10 (commit 1e8a850), PQconnectStart() had no in-tree
> > >> callers outside of libpq itself.
> > > [Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.]
> > >
> > > The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Peter,
> > > since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> > > item.
> >
> > I don't think I can usefully contribute to this. Could someone else
> > take it?
>
> If nobody volunteers, you could always resolve this by reverting 1e8a850 and
> successors.

I've volunteered a fix nearby, just can't test it. I don't think we can
require committers to work on windows.

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2017-08-11 01:58:34 Re: BUG #14776: ecpg 4.12.0 issues with macros containing line continued blocks
Previous Message Noah Misch 2017-08-11 01:51:07 Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-08-11 01:57:36 SCRAM protocol documentation
Previous Message Noah Misch 2017-08-11 01:51:07 Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken