| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "Augustine, Jobin" <jobin(dot)augustine(at)openscg(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken |
| Date: | 2017-08-06 21:55:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20170806215521.d6fq4esvx7s5ejka@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-08-06 13:07:42 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Is anybody working on a patch like this? I can try writing one blindly,
> if somebody else tests it. But if somebody natively on windows is
> working on it, that's going to be more efficient. It'd be nice to have
> something merged by wrap tomorrow...
Here's a prototype patch implementing what Tom outlined. I've compiled
it with mingw under linux, but haven't run it. Could some windows
capable person take this for a spin?
Unfortunately we can't just push this to the BF and see what it says -
our tests don't catch this one... And there's not that much time before
the wrap.
Anybody have an opinion about adding ifs for WL_SOCKET_CONNECTED to
!win32 implementations rather than redefining it to WL_SOCKET_WRITEABLE?
- Andres
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| connected.diff | text/x-diff | 6.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-06 22:04:49 | Re: Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-08-06 21:17:41 | Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-08-06 22:04:49 | Re: Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-08-06 21:37:31 | Re: snapbuild woes |