From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, scott(at)deltaex(dot)com, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #14758: Segfault with logical replication on a function index |
Date: | 2017-08-01 22:52:32 |
Message-ID: | 20170801225232.csedyabn6rifsrx6@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-08-01 16:28:31 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 7/28/17 06:07, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > I could reproduced this issue and it seems to me that the cause of
> > this is that the table sync worker didn't get a snapshot before
> > starting table copy. Attached patch fixes this problem.
>
> Should it be GetTransactionSnapshot() rather than GetLatestSnapshot()?
Don't think it makes a meaningful difference here, but I agree it's more
consistent.
- Andres
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2017-08-02 01:23:24 | Re: BUG #14758: Segfault with logical replication on a function index |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-08-01 20:42:33 | Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-08-01 22:58:32 | Why does logical replication launcher exit with exit code 1? |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-08-01 22:25:38 | Re: reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partition table |