From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternative hosts when some errors occur |
Date: | 2017-07-28 05:30:49 |
Message-ID: | 20170728053049.GA2611952@rfd.leadboat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:08:41AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
> <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> > From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> >> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut
> >> The problem is that if we decide to change the behavior mid-beta, then we'll
> >> only have the rest of beta to find out whether people will like the other
> >> behavior.
> >>
> >> I would aim for the behavior that is most suitable for refinement in the
> >> future. The current behavior seems to match that.
> >
> > I think the pre-final release period is the very timing for refinement, in the perspective of users and PG developers as users.
>
> Sure that is the correct period to argue.
We've reached that period. If anyone is going to push for a change here, now
is the time. Absent such arguments, the behavior won't change.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2017-07-28 05:47:56 | Re: map_partition_varattnos() and whole-row vars |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2017-07-28 05:28:33 | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers |