Re: segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 02:29:32AM +0000, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 08:04:30AM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> >
> >
> > On July 24, 2017 7:10:19 AM GMT+01:00, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> > >On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 01:04:10PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > >> Ok, I'll flesh out the patch till Thursday. But I do think we're
> > >going
> > >> to have to do something about the back branches, too.
> > >
> > >This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update.
> > >Kindly send
> > >a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent
> > >status
> > >update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> > >https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
> >
> > I sent out a note fleshed out patch last week, which Tom reviewed. Planning to update it to address that review today or tomorrow.
>
> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED. This PostgreSQL 10 open item is long past due
for your status update. Please reacquaint yourself with the policy on open
item ownership[1] and then reply immediately. If I do not hear from you by
2017-07-29 05:00 UTC, I will transfer this item to release management team
ownership without further notice.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com