Re: GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Mark Rofail <markm(dot)rofail(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays
Date: 2017-07-18 21:13:31
Message-ID: 20170718211331.6h7vvgzlsoxklbvi@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mark Rofail wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 at 7:43 pm, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> > separate operators for int4[] @>> int8, int4[] @>> int4, int4[] @>> int2,
> > int4[] @>> numeric.
> >
>
> My only comment on the separate operators is its high maintenance. Any new
> datatype introduced a corresponding operator should be created.

Yes.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-07-18 21:14:52 Re: GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-07-18 20:53:43 Re: segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call