| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net |
| Cc: | michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SCRAM auth and Pgpool-II |
| Date: | 2017-07-08 01:28:30 |
| Message-ID: | 20170708.102830.9486568757116082.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> For more details what Pgpool-II actually does in md5 auth, please see:
>>
>> https://pgpool.net/mediawiki/index.php/FAQ#How_does_pgpool-II_handle_md5_authentication.3F
>
> I see. In short, that's not going to be able to work with SCRAM.
That's my understanding with SCRAM too.
> We also certainly can't weaken or break SCRAM to address Pgpool's needs.
Right, that's not what I want too.
> I'm afraid an alternative approach will need to be considered for Pgpool
> to be able to do what it does today, as I outlined in my other email.
Thank your for your comment. Probably now is the time to give up
to support SCRAM in Pgpool-II.
Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-07-08 03:11:06 | Re: hash index on unlogged tables doesn't behave as expected |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-07-08 00:39:11 | Re: SCRAM auth and Pgpool-II |