Re: New partitioning - some feedback

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New partitioning - some feedback
Date: 2017-07-07 16:03:03
Message-ID: 20170707160303.GA26380@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:29:26AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On 2017/07/07 9:02, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> > I've been trying out the new partitioning in version 10. Firstly, I must
> > say this is excellent - so much nicer than the old inheritance based method!
>
> Thanks. :)
>
> > My only niggle is the display of partitioned tables via \d etc. e.g:
> >
> > part=# \d
> > List of relations
> > Schema | Name | Type | Owner
> > --------+----------------------+-------+----------
> > public | date_fact | table | postgres
> > public | date_fact_201705 | table | postgres
> > public | date_fact_201706 | table | postgres
> > public | date_fact_20170601 | table | postgres
> > public | date_fact_2017060100 | table | postgres
> > public | date_fact_201707 | table | postgres
> > public | date_fact_rest | table | postgres
> > (7 rows)

Would showing relispartition=tru tables only in \d+ fix this?

Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-07-07 16:24:21 Re: SCRAM auth and Pgpool-II
Previous Message Kaare Rasmussen 2017-07-07 15:58:16 Re: Rust bindings to pgtypes lib