| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re-indent HEAD tomorrow? |
| Date: | 2017-06-21 21:39:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20170621213914.y4iu65kbwkctleeh@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-06-21 17:28:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Right now we're really just speculating about how much pain there will
> be, on either end of this. So it'd be interesting for somebody who's
> carrying large out-of-tree patches (EDB? Citus?) to try the new
> pgindent version on a back branch and see how much of their patches no
> longer apply afterwards.
Citus isn't a patched version of postgres anymore, butan extension (with
some ugly hacks to make that possible ...). Therefore it shouldn't
affect us in any meaningful way.
> And I think it'd make sense to wait a few
> months and garner some experience with back-patching from v10 into the
> older branches, so we have more than guesses about how much pain not
> reindenting will be for us.
Hm. A few days / a week or two, okay. But a few months? That'll incur
the backpatch cost during all that time...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-06-21 21:44:42 | Re: Re-indent HEAD tomorrow? |
| Previous Message | Euler Taveira | 2017-06-21 21:32:42 | Re: CREATE SUBSCRIPTION log noise |