From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Piotr Stefaniak <postgres(at)piotr-stefaniak(dot)me> |
Subject: | Re: Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation |
Date: | 2017-06-19 19:31:00 |
Message-ID: | 20170619193100.GU1769@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > * Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut
> >> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >>> On 6/16/17 10:51, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>>> So I'm back to the position that we ought to stick the indent
> >>>> code under src/tools/ in our main repo. Is anyone really
> >>>> seriously against that?
>
> >>> I think it would be better to have it separate.
>
> >> +1.
>
> > +1.
>
> Given the license issues raised downthread, we have no choice in
> the short term. So I have a request in to create a separate repo
> on git.postgresql.org (whose chain do I need to pull to get that
> approved, btw?)
uhhhh, that would probably be pginfra in some capacity, but I don't
recall seeing any notification of such a request.
I will follow up with those responsible, #blamemagnus
Thanks!
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-06-19 19:47:45 | Re: Decimal64 and Decimal128 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-06-19 19:27:47 | Re: Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation |