| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Piotr Stefaniak <postgres(at)piotr-stefaniak(dot)me> |
| Subject: | Re: pgindent (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Preventive maintenance in advance of pgindent run.) |
| Date: | 2017-06-13 21:12:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20170613211213.GB26041@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 05:00:31PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Anyway, it is now time to fish or cut bait. I don't think we can wait
> much longer to decide whether we're going to adopt this new indent
> version for PG 10. I think we should. The floor is open for votes.
Works for me.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Piotr Stefaniak | 2017-06-13 21:13:12 | Re: pgindent (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Preventive maintenance in advance of pgindent run.) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-06-13 21:00:31 | Re: pgindent (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Preventive maintenance in advance of pgindent run.) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Piotr Stefaniak | 2017-06-13 21:13:12 | Re: pgindent (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Preventive maintenance in advance of pgindent run.) |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-06-13 21:08:17 | Re: v10beta pg_catalog diagrams |