Re: walsender & parallelism

On 2017-06-08 23:04:31 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 10:54:57PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 11:06:29PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > On 2017-06-02 22:12:46 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 11:27:55PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > > On 5/31/17 23:54, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > > > On 5/29/17 22:01, Noah Misch wrote:
> > > > > >> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 01:45:59PM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> > > > > >>> On May 23, 2017 1:42:41 PM EDT, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > > > > >>>> Hi,
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> so this didn't really move anywhere AFAICS, do we think the approach
> > > > > >>>> I've chosen is good or do we want to do something else here?
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> Can you add it to the open items list?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have posted an update. The next update will be Friday.
> > > > >
> > > > > Andres is now working on this. Let's give him a bit of time. ;-)
> > > >
> > > > If you intended this as your soon-due status update, it is missing a mandatory
> > > > bit.
> > >
> > > I'm now owning this item. I've posted patches, await review. If none
> > > were to be forthcoming, I'll do another pass Monday, and commit.
> >
> > This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
> > a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> > update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
>
> IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED. This PostgreSQL 10 open item is long past due
> for your status update. Please reacquaint yourself with the policy on open
> item ownership[1] and then reply immediately. If I do not hear from you by
> 2017-06-10 07:00 UTC, I will transfer this item to release management team
> ownership without further notice.

The issue starting this thread is resolved, including several issues
found in its wake, with 47fd420fb4d3e77dde960312f8672c82b14ecbad
6e1dd2773eb60a6ab87b27b8d9391b756e904ac3 and c1abe6c786d8f00643de8519140d77644b474163

There's a remaining testing patch, and some related things left though.
Basically patches 0001 and 0003 from
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/81eaca60-3f7b-6a21-5531-fd51ffbf3f63%402ndquadrant.com
I'd personally rather see a separate open-items entry for those, since
this isn't related to paralellism, signal handler or such.

Petr, Peter (henceforth P^2), do you agree?

Greetings,

Andres Freund