Re: Improving PostgreSQL insert performance

From: Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Improving PostgreSQL insert performance
Date: 2017-06-09 13:28:57
Message-ID: 20170609132857.GC26506@aart.rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 03:24:15PM +0200, Andreas Kretschmer wrote:
>
>
> Am 09.06.2017 um 15:04 schrieb Frits Jalvingh:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I am trying to improve the runtime of a big data warehouse
> >application. One significant bottleneck found was insert
> >performance, so I am investigating ways of getting Postgresql to
> >insert data faster.
>
> * use COPY instead of Insert, it is much faster
> * bundle all Insert into one transaction
> * use a separate disk/spindel for the transaction log
>
>
>
> >
> >I already changed the following config parameters:
> >work_mem 512MB
> >synchronous_commit off
> >shared_buffers 512mb
> >commit_delay 100000
> >autovacuum_naptime 10min
> >
> >Postgres version is 9.6.3 on Ubuntu 17.04 64 bit, on a i7-4790K
> >with 16GB memory and an Intel 750 SSD. JDBC driver is
> >postgresql-42.1.1.
> >
>
> increase shared_buffers, with 16gb ram i would suggest 8gb

+1 Without even checking, I think Oracle is configured to use a LOT
more memory than 512mb.

Regards,
Ken

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cocco Gianfranco 2017-06-09 13:55:04 Invalid WAL segment size. Allowed values are 1,2,4,8,16,32,64
Previous Message Andreas Kretschmer 2017-06-09 13:24:15 Re: Improving PostgreSQL insert performance