From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Regina Obe <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us> |
Cc: | 'PostgreSQL-development' <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Parallel Aggregation support for aggregate functions that use transitions not implemented for array_agg |
Date: | 2017-06-06 19:23:49 |
Message-ID: | 20170606192349.GD32474@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 01:52:45PM -0400, Regina Obe wrote:
> It seems CREATE AGGREGATE was expanded in 9.6 to support parallelization of
> aggregate functions using transitions, with the addition of serialfunc and
> deserialfunc to the aggregate definitions.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/sql-createaggregate.html
>
> I was looking at the PostgreSQL 10 source code for some example usages of
> this and was hoping that array_agg and string_agg would support the feature.
> At a cursory glance, it seems they do not use this.
> Examples I see that do support it are the average and standard deviation
> functions.
>
> Is there a reason for this or it just wasn't gotten to?
I'd bet on lack of tuits. Anything with text has to deal with
collation issues, etc., that may make this trickier than it first
appears.
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-06-06 19:26:09 | Re: Parallel Aggregation support for aggregate functions that use transitions not implemented for array_agg |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-06-06 19:21:34 | Re: Re: Alter subscription..SET - NOTICE message is coming for table which is already removed |